The Titanic Murders Read online

  Praise for Max Allan Collins

  Two-time Winner of the Shamus Award for Best Novel

  “Collins blends fact and fiction like no other writer.”

  —Andrew Vachss

  “A terrific writer.”

  —Mickey Spillane

  “When it comes to exploring the rich possibilities of history in a way that holds and entertains the reader, nobody does it better than Max Collins.”

  —John Lutz

  “Max Allan Collins masterfully blends fact and fiction… transcends the historical thriller.”

  —Jeffrey Deaver

  “No one fictionalizes real-life mysteries better.”

  —Armchair Detective

  “An uncanny ability to blend fact and fiction.”

  —South Bend Tribune

  “Collins has an outwardly artless style that conceals a great deal of art.”

  —New York Times

  “Collins displays a compelling talent for flowing narrative and concise, believable dialogue.”

  —Library Journal

  “Collins’ blending of fact and fancy is masterful—there’s no better word for it. And his ability to maintain suspense, even when the outcome is known, is the mark of an exceptional storyteller.”

  —Robert Wade, San Diego Union

  “Probably no one except E. L. Doctorow in Ragtime has so successfully blended real characters and events with fictional ones. The versatile Collins is an excellent storyteller.”

  —Sandy Campbell, The Tennessean

  The characters and events portrayed in this book are fictitious. Any similarity to real persons, living or dead, is coincidental and not intended by the author.

  Text copyright © 1999 Max Allan Collins

  All rights reserved.

  No part of this book may be reproduced, or stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without express written permission of the publisher.

  Published by Thomas & Mercer

  P.O. Box 400818

  Las Vegas, NV 89140

  ISBN-13: 9781612185194

  ISBN-10: 1612185193

  For Stephanie Keenan—who is under the mistaken impression that anyone could ever forget her

  Though this work is fanciful, every character in these pages existed, and an underpinning of history supports their characterizations. No disrespect is meant to these real people, or to the tragic event that engulfed them. Our interest in the Titanic—and the enjoyment taken in traveling back to that simpler, grander time—must always be tempered by the knowledge that men, women and children died on that night we still remember.

  “There was not the slightest thought of danger in the minds of those who sat around the tables in the luxurious dining saloon of the Titanic.”

  —May Futrelle

  CONTENTS

  PROLOGUE: A TRIP TO SCITUATE

  DAY ONE: APRIL 10, 1912

  ONE: A BIRTHDAY PRESENT

  TWO: A CLOSE CALL

  THREE: SUNSET OVER CHERBOURG

  DAY TWO: APRIL 11, 1912

  FOUR: CAPTAIN’S TABLE

  DAY THREE: APRIL 12, 1912

  FIVE: THE PROBLEM OF C13

  SIX: INFORMAL INQUIRY

  SEVEN: SECOND-CLASS CITIZEN

  EIGHT: THE MUMMY’S CURSE

  DAY FOUR: APRIL 13, 1912

  NINE: STEERAGE

  TEN: SHIPBOARD SÉANCE

  DAY FIVE: APRIL 14, 1912

  ELEVEN: SMOOTH SAILING

  EPILOGUE: THAT NIGHT REMEMBERED

  A TIP OF THE CAPTAIN’S HAT

  ABOUT THE AUTHOR

  PROLOGUE

  A TRIP TO SCITUATE

  From the beginning, mystery and controversy have been stow-aways on the Titanic’s crossing into history. The world’s largest, most luxurious steamship—with a First-Class passenger list that was a Who’s Who of its day—the R.M.S. Titanic began her maiden voyage midday April 10, 1912, and ended it prematurely in the midnight hours bridging April 14 and 15, after brushing an iceberg designed by God or fate to challenge the naively arrogant men who had deemed the ship unsinkable.

  But no one is certain how many died on that clear starry night in icy Atlantic waters. The American inquiry into the disaster came up with 1,517 dead, the British tallied 1,490, while the British board of trade said 1,503, and various respected authorities today cite figures that range as low as 1,502 and as high as 1,523. What none of these authorities, past or present, cites are the two deaths aboard the Titanic that preceded the sinking.

  The two murders.

  Before this tale begins proper and I take my proper place next to the Wizard of Oz—behind the curtain—I would like to share with my readers how I came to learn of the Titanic murders, and how this fascinating historical footnote came to elude those far better, and more knowledgeable, Titanic scholars who have preceded me.

  It began, as does so much in modern life, with a phone call.

  Like most authors, I am frequently contacted by strangers, would-be collaborators who have a wonderful idea, or a fascinating life story, and all that’s left for me to do is write it up. Everyone who has ever been involved in a crime (as a victim or a perpetrator) or who has survived a war (World War II or Vietnam, most frequently) is convinced that theirs was a unique experience, and that New York publishing and Hollywood studios are clamoring for the opportunity to throw money at them for sharing their story with a lucky, waiting world.

  This is rarely the case, of course, and these individuals would have a better shot at fame and fortune by telling their timeless tale to the convenience-store clerk while scratching off “instant win” squares on lottery tickets. Besides, authors usually like to cook up their own ideas and, anyway, as a mystery writer, I’m not really suited to ghostwriting someone’s military memoirs or turning Great-Aunt Ida’s fascinating life on the prairie into a manuscript for the Christian bookstore market.

  So I was skeptical when I received the phone call, late that Sunday evening, at my Muscatine, Iowa, home, from a would-be collaborator who refused to even identify himself by name.

  “You were recommended to me,” the male voice said, a reedy baritone. A hint of an accent was in there, somewhere—French? French-Canadian?

  “Recommended how? By who?”

  It wasn’t a great connection; obviously long distance, as scratchy as an ancient phonograph record.

  “Mutual friend.”

  “What mutual friend?”

  “I have an idea for you. It’ll make a great book, a great movie.”

  I rubbed my eyes. “Really.”

  “I read your novel.”

  “Which one?”

  “The Lindbergh-baby book. Very good. Thorough job.”

  Well, now he’d bought himself a little time with me; he had just been about to land in that same limbo where my household dispatches phone solicitors. But compliments, like royalties, are immediately embraced by all writers.

  “Thanks,” I said. “I worked hard on that.”

  “Interesting case. You think you solved it, the kidnapping?”

  “I think my solution holds up as well as anything anybody’s come up with, yeah.”

  He paused; while static filled the empty air, I was imagining a face to go with the voice: thirtyish, rugged, smugly smiling….

  “You like history. You like to find the mystery in history, don’t you?”

  “Yeah, it’s kind of a speciality…. Well, listen, it was nice of you to call. I got one on Amelia Earhart in the works. You might like that, too—you might want to watch for it.”

  This is where a fan calling would have asked what the name of the new book was, and when was it comin
g out. But my vaguely French long-distance caller had an apparent non sequitur for me, instead.

  “What about the Titanic?” he asked.

  “What about it?”

  “Lot of interest. Many books. TV specials. Videos of Ballard’s dives, big sellers.”

  I knew, vaguely, what he was talking about. Dr. Robert Ballard’s discovery of the shipwreck on the ocean’s floor had been big news, not long before, and generated big dollars. Even before Ballard, interest in the Titanic never seemed to wane, and I’d known about the famous disaster at sea since childhood. My generation of kids was big on Walter Lord’s book A Night to Remember, and I’d seen the movie version at a matinee in a majestic theater long since torn down.

  Also, my anonymous caller had touched a distant nerve. While I did not have an interest in the Titanic in general, I had a specific interest in one of the ship’s notable passengers….

  So I said, “The Titanic, right, right… is that your idea? Something about the Titanic? New theory on why and how it sank or something?”

  “You know, Ballard, he called us grave robbers.”

  “Called who grave robbers?”

  “Ballard thinks the wreck, it’s like an undersea cemetery.”

  “Well, it is sort of a grave site.”

  “More than you know.”

  “Look,” I said, interested but irritated, “what’s this about? Were you on one of Ballard’s expeditions?”

  “Not Ballard’s.”

  “Whose, then?”

  I was aware the French Oceanographic Institute—INFREMER—had ignored Dr. Ballard’s wish that the Titanic be left undisturbed, that no salvage or recovery be pursued, no artifacts removed, and had undertaken several expeditions to do just that. The artifacts salvaged, mostly from a debris field between the two sections of the sunken ship, had been hyped on a tacky television production hosted by Telly Savalas, and then treated rather more respectfully and responsibly, in museum exhibitions around the world.

  He was saying, “You know, they get away with this, Ballard too, ’cause they found no bodies.”

  Though no expert, I remembered from documentaries I’d seen that most scientists and explorers had expected to find the Titanic more or less perfectly preserved, a virtual Edwardian time capsule, due to the coldness at that depth of the ocean, and the lack of oxygen—furniture, clothing, even human bodies, showing little or no decomposition.

  This theory, like so many about the Titanic, had proved wrong. Deep-sea organisms had eaten away fabric and wood—and flesh, and for that matter, bone. An empty pair of shoes, the feet eaten right out of them, was as close as anyone had come to finding the remains of a Titanic fatality.

  And, as my anonymous caller indicated, the various visits to the Titanic, whether for purposes of shooting documentary footage or salvaging artifacts, were acceptable to society at large only because no human remains had been viewed by the explorers, or their cameras. The ghostly majesty of the rust-encrusted wreckage would have turned ghastly had its decayed decks been littered with human rubble, had bones mingled with the bottles, bedsprings, dishes and dolls of the debris field.

  “Listen,” I said, close to hanging up, “you’re going to have to give me your name.”

  “I don’t know you, yet. Don’t trust you, yet. This is big money. Dangerous, too.”

  “Why’s it dangerous?”

  “I signed papers not to tell. I took money.”

  “What for? Who from, damnit!”

  “… I can’t say.”

  I held the phone away from my face and glared at it; then I brought it back to my ear and mouth and said tightly, “Then why are you bothering me?”

  Silence on the line, staticky silence.

  “… They thought the galley area would be a good place to look. For the kind of things easy to take, still in nice shape… dishes, silverware, pots, pans… you know what a White Star dish from the Titanic would be worth?”

  Had my anonymous caller been on a salvage expedition to the Titanic, with modern-day pirates?

  “I’m sure a lot,” I said.

  “They had huge refrigeration on that ship. Very modern for back then, condenser-coil water system. Separate cold rooms for different perishables, you know, meat, vegetables, wine and champagne… and on the orlop deck, a cold-storage cargo hold, for other things… away from the food.”

  I didn’t know what an orlop deck was (it’s the lowest deck of a ship with multidecks, in this case right above the Titanic’s three immense propellers) but I did have a question. It’s the kind of question a mystery writer would ask.

  “This cold-storage hold—would that be where they’d put somebody who died?”

  There was a nod in his voice. “That ship had everything—swimming pool, squash court, barbershop, Turkish bath, operating room, everything—except a morgue.”

  The staticky silence seemed to need filling, before he would go on; so I said, “I see.”

  “You’re right—the cold cargo hold, in through number-five hatch… that’s where we found them.”

  “… Bodies?”

  “We didn’t know that’s what they were at first. They were just big canvas bags, sewn shut… beautifully preserved. The submersible brought the bags up, we hauled them out on deck, and we cut one of them open… the stench was like a sewer….”

  “I don’t need details.”

  “Have you read Poe?”

  “Of course I’ve read Poe.”

  “Have you read the story of the sick man who is hypnotized?”

  “Yeah, and I saw the movie.” He was referring to “The Facts in the Case of M. Valdemar.”

  “Then you remember the hypnotized man, he finally collapses in an oozing pile of putrescence, melting from the bones—”

  “Okay, okay,” I said. “I may want to eat again someday.”

  “It’s not what National Geographic wants for a Discovery Channel special, I can tell you that much. We never opened the other bag, but there was a body in it, all right.”

  Staticky silence, as if some distant telegraph message were going unanswered.

  I asked, “And no one knows of this?”

  “Only those on deck that day.”

  “On what deck? What ship, what expedition? You sound French.”

  “Oh? I thought my English was very good.”

  “Berlitz would hire you in a heartbeat. What about the bodies?”

  “We buried them at sea. We swore not to talk of it, we were paid handsomely… I’ll tell you one thing about the body in the bag, the bag we opened?”

  “Yes?”

  “Its skull had been crushed. Caved in.”

  “Couldn’t that have happened when the ship went down?”

  “I don’t think so. I think this was death by violence, man’s violence, not nature. Murder. Isn’t that what you write about?”

  “I do, but I’m not really a nonfiction writer. I mean, I research real, unsolved crimes, but then I write a fictional work around the facts I uncover.”

  “That’s why I called you. I can’t risk a true treatment of this, but if you could devise a fiction story around it…”

  “I don’t know. You’re not giving me much to go on… I’m afraid a nonfiction treatment would be where the interest, and the money, is. Hey, come on, pal—what is your name?”

  “Are you interested in my story?”

  “Yeah, I’m interested. Mildly. But interested.”

  And he hung up.

  Perhaps I hadn’t shown sufficient enthusiasm, and if you’d had as many crank calls, relating to your work, as I’ve had, you’d have been at least as skeptical as I was. Still, the notion of a murder—of two murders—on the Titanic, before she went down… that was intriguing.

  And it did tap into my very narrow, specific Titanic interest, an interest I’d carried since childhood….

  Among the Titanic’s famous passengers, hobnobbing with John Jacob Astor, Molly Brown, Ben Guggenheim and the rest, was one of the mo
st celebrated and popular American mystery writers of his day, Jacques Futrelle, creator of Professor S.F.X. Van Dusen. Futrelle’s creation, also known as the Thinking Machine, was a cerebral sleuth whose exaggerated cranium housed a formidable brain, a dabbler in detection who refused payment for his crime solving, displaying a cold, imperious attitude (and devotion to pure logic) that made Sherlock Holmes seem warm and fuzzy.

  Despite the French ring of his name, Futrelle was an American journalist turned fiction writer. His tales of so-called “Impossible Mystery” were a major influence on Agatha Christie; there is much of Professor Van Dusen in her Hercule Poirot and his celebrated “little gray cells.” The Thinking Machine’s first case remains his most famous: “The Problem of Cell 13,” in which the detective, on a bet, escapes from a death-row cell. This tale remains one of the two or three most reprinted short stories in mystery fiction, and is the first detective story I remember reading.

  And the brief biography of Futrelle included in the preface to the Scholastic Books’ collection of “Thinking Machine” stories was where I first heard about the Titanic, and the sad news that Futrelle—and a number of unpublished Professor Van Dusen stories—went down with the ship.

  I’d always been interested in Futrelle, and loved his stories, but little of his work was in print and coming by editions of his handful of novels was difficult. Consequently I hadn’t given him much thought in perhaps twenty years when the Robert Ballard–stirred revival of Titanic interest sent journalists scurrying to talk to survivors of the tragedy, and even relatives. A wire-service interview with Futrelle’s daughter Virginia made me recall how, as a boy, I’d enjoyed Jacques Futrelle’s fiction.

  Now, ironically, from a single wire-service story, I knew more about his grown daughter than I did about Futrelle himself; and she’d had quite a life of her own.

  Born in 1897, Virginia had been an operatic prima donna featured in musical revues, frequently sharing the bill with young Cary Grant’s acrobatic act at the Hippodrome in New York. She toured Europe, consorted with show business royalty (she was Barbara Stanwyck’s bridesmaid) and eventually married Charles F. Raymond, an eminent New York theatrical manager, living with him in London and, after World War II, in Johannesburg, South Africa. Later in life she worked in broadcasting, in production, winding up back in Massachusetts, where she’d grown up.